Skip to content

feat: 📝 AI Disclosure in PRs#1

Merged
Paillat-dev merged 2 commits intomainfrom
feat/ai-disclosure
Feb 26, 2026
Merged

feat: 📝 AI Disclosure in PRs#1
Paillat-dev merged 2 commits intomainfrom
feat/ai-disclosure

Conversation

@Paillat-dev
Copy link
Member

Summary

self explanatory

Information

  • This PR fixes an issue.
  • This PR adds something new (e.g. new method or parameters).
  • This PR is a breaking change (e.g. methods or parameters removed/renamed).
  • This PR is not a code change (e.g. documentation, README, typehinting,
    examples, ...).

Checklist

  • I have searched the open pull requests for duplicates.
  • If code changes were made then they have been tested.
    • I have updated the documentation to reflect the changes.
  • If type: ignore comments were used, a comment is also left explaining why.
  • I have updated the changelog to include these changes.

@Icebluewolf
Copy link
Member

Would this be a good time to change the format of the "Information Section" as well? I dont like that it uses checkboxes when it is not really a checklist, and it will often have unnecessary text.

@Paillat-dev
Copy link
Member Author

That makes sense, why not. Feel free to propose something or I'll make something up later tomorrow?

Signed-off-by: Lala Sabathil <aiko@aitsys.dev>
@Icebluewolf
Copy link
Member

I was thinking that all of those lines you be in a block comment. Then there are instructions to copy and paste relevant lines outside the comment. I think that is less work than removing markdown comments.

@Paillat-dev
Copy link
Member Author

Paillat-dev commented Feb 26, 2026

@Icebluewolf If we do that people will just not do it bc of pure laziness

@Paillat-dev Paillat-dev merged commit 4c699a5 into main Feb 26, 2026
1 check passed
@Paillat-dev Paillat-dev deleted the feat/ai-disclosure branch February 26, 2026 15:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants