Conversation
boring-cyborg
bot
added
component:api
component:networking
component:UI
component:vpc
labels
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@nvazquez a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with no SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #12487 +/- ##
==========================================
Coverage 17.84% 17.85%
- Complexity 15980 15997 +17
==========================================
Files 5929 5930 +1
Lines 531084 531511 +427
Branches 64914 64989 +75
==========================================
+ Hits 94783 94882 +99
- Misses 425686 425999 +313
- Partials 10615 10630 +15
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✖️ el8 ✖️ el9 ✖️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 16471 |
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@nvazquez a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with no SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✖️ el8 ✖️ el9 ✔️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 16473 |
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@nvazquez a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with no SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✖️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 16475 |
|
@blueorangutan test keepEnv |
|
@nvazquez a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-15239)
|
nvazquez
requested review from
DaanHoogland,
Pearl1594,
shwstppr,
sureshanaparti and
weizhouapache
nvazquez
changed the title
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@nvazquez a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with no SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✖️ el8 ✖️ el9 ✔️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 16547 |
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@sureshanaparti a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with no SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✖️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 16549 |
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with no SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
weizhouapache
left a comment
weizhouapache
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- can we create VPC offering with conserve mode via API and UI ?
- can you add smoke tests ?
- source nat can be used by vpc tiers
- other public Ips too
engine/schema/src/main/resources/META-INF/db/schema-42210to42300.sql
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
engine/schema/src/main/resources/META-INF/db/schema-42210to42300.sql
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 16553 |
nvazquez
changed the title
| // (except for VPCs with conserve mode = true) | ||
| if ((!isNewRuleOnVpcNetwork || !isVpcConserveModeEnabled) | ||
| && rule.getNetworkId() != newRule.getNetworkId() && rule.getState() != State.Revoke) { | ||
| String errMsg = String.format("New rule is for a different network than what's specified in rule %s", rule.getXid()); | ||
| if (isNewRuleOnVpcNetwork) { | ||
| errMsg += String.format(" - VPC id=%s is not using conserve mode", newRuleNetwork.getVpcId()); | ||
| } | ||
| throw new NetworkRuleConflictException(errMsg); | ||
| } |
| NetworkVO newRuleNetwork = _networkDao.findById(newRule.getNetworkId()); | ||
| if (newRuleNetwork == null) { | ||
| throw new InvalidParameterValueException("Unable to create firewall rule as cannot find network by id=" + newRule.getNetworkId()); | ||
| } | ||
| boolean isNewRuleOnVpcNetwork = newRuleNetwork.getVpcId() != null; | ||
| boolean isVpcConserveModeEnabled = false; | ||
| if (isNewRuleOnVpcNetwork) { | ||
| VpcOfferingVO vpcOffering = vpcOfferingDao.findById(newRuleNetwork.getVpcId()); | ||
| isVpcConserveModeEnabled = vpcOffering != null && vpcOffering.isConserveMode(); | ||
| } |
RosiKyu
left a comment
RosiKyu
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
PR needs some fixes:
Issues Identified:
- The
conservemodeparameter is not being passed from API command to the service layer (value not saved to DB) - The
conservemodefield is not being returned in the API response (VpcOfferingResponse)
TC1: Create VPC Offering with Conserve Mode = true
Objective: Verify VPC offering can be created with conserve mode enabled and the field is properly stored and returned via API.
Test Steps:
- Create VPC offering with
conservemode=trueparameter - Verify the offering via
list vpcofferingsAPI - Verify the value is stored correctly in the database
Expected Result:
- VPC offering is created successfully
- API response includes
conservemode: true - Database shows
conserve_mode = 1
Actual Result:
- VPC offering created successfully with ID
b9b783b2-b1fb-4588-b383-ff36cc9e54ab - BUG: API response does NOT include
conservemodefield at all - BUG: Database shows
conserve_mode = 0instead of1despite passingconservemode=true
Status: Failed
Test Evidence:
(localcloud) 🐱 > create vpcoffering name="Test-Conserve-Mode-VPC-Offering" displaytext="VPC Offering with Conserve Mode Enabled" supportedservices="Dhcp,Dns,SourceNat,PortForwarding,Lb,UserData,StaticNat,NetworkACL" conservemode=true
{
"vpcoffering": {
"created": "2026-01-30T09:02:54+0000",
"displaytext": "VPC Offering with Conserve Mode Enabled",
"distributedvpcrouter": false,
"fornsx": false,
"id": "b9b783b2-b1fb-4588-b383-ff36cc9e54ab",
"internetprotocol": "IPv4",
"isdefault": false,
"name": "Test-Conserve-Mode-VPC-Offering",
"service": [
{
"name": "Dhcp",
"provider": [
{
"name": "VpcVirtualRouter"
}
]
},
{
"name": "StaticNat",
"provider": [
{
"name": "VpcVirtualRouter"
}
]
},
{
"name": "UserData",
"provider": [
{
"name": "VpcVirtualRouter"
}
]
},
{
"name": "SourceNat",
"provider": [
{
"name": "VpcVirtualRouter"
}
]
},
{
"name": "Lb",
"provider": [
{
"name": "VpcVirtualRouter"
}
]
},
{
"name": "NetworkACL",
"provider": [
{
"name": "VpcVirtualRouter"
}
]
},
{
"name": "Dns",
"provider": [
{
"name": "VpcVirtualRouter"
}
]
},
{
"name": "PortForwarding",
"provider": [
{
"name": "VpcVirtualRouter"
}
]
}
],
"specifyasnumber": false,
"state": "Disabled",
"supportsregionLevelvpc": false
}
}
(localcloud) 🐱 > list vpcofferings name="Test-Conserve-Mode-VPC-Offering"
{
"count": 1,
"vpcoffering": [
{
"created": "2026-01-30T09:02:54+0000",
"displaytext": "VPC Offering with Conserve Mode Enabled",
"distributedvpcrouter": false,
"fornsx": false,
"id": "b9b783b2-b1fb-4588-b383-ff36cc9e54ab",
"internetprotocol": "IPv4",
"isdefault": false,
"name": "Test-Conserve-Mode-VPC-Offering",
"service": [...],
"specifyasnumber": false,
"state": "Disabled",
"supportsregionLevelvpc": false
}
]
}
mysql> SELECT id, name, conserve_mode FROM cloud.vpc_offerings WHERE name='Test-Conserve-Mode-VPC-Offering';
+----+---------------------------------+---------------+
| id | name | conserve_mode |
+----+---------------------------------+---------------+
| 8 | Test-Conserve-Mode-VPC-Offering | 0 |
+----+---------------------------------+---------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@nvazquez a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with no SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 16654 |
|
@blueorangutan test |
|
@nvazquez a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-15348)
|
|
@blueorangutan test keepEnv |
|
@nvazquez a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-15355)
|
6 participants
Description
This PR extends the conserve mode for VPCs tiers added on the previous PRs: #8309, #10744 by allowing:
This PR also introduces the following changes:
Fixes: #8317
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?