Skip to content

Comments

chore: Remove package name to satisfy automated security checks#2

Open
Jakub Kadlubiec (jakubka) wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
jakubka-patch-1
Open

chore: Remove package name to satisfy automated security checks#2
Jakub Kadlubiec (jakubka) wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
jakubka-patch-1

Conversation

@jakubka
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR removes the "name" and "version" fields from package.json to satisfy automated security checks in a public code exercise repository. The repository uses ES modules and contains JavaScript exercises with no external dependencies or npm publishing workflows.

Changes:

  • Removed "name" field ("activities-stats") from package.json
  • Removed "version" field ("1.0.0") from package.json

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@@ -1,6 +1,4 @@
{
Copy link

Copilot AI Feb 24, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removing the "name" and "version" fields from package.json may cause issues with npm tooling and package management. While technically valid for a non-published package, many npm commands and tools expect these fields to be present. Consider whether this is the correct approach to satisfy security checks. If the security concern is about exposing the package name "activities-stats", consider alternatives such as renaming the package or configuring the security scanning tool to exclude this repository. Could you clarify which specific security check requires this removal?

Suggested change
{
{
"name": "activities-stats",
"version": "1.0.0",

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
@petrm-integromat

Jakub Kadlubiec (@jakubka) Could you please edit the codeowners file so the PR does not ping the entire engineering? 🙏

@jakubka
Copy link
Contributor Author

Jakub Kadlubiec (Jakub Kadlubiec (@jakubka)) Could you please edit the codeowners file so the PR does not ping the entire engineering? 🙏

Petr Martišek (@petrm-integromat) yeah, I need to tweak it. That wasn't the intention. I want everyone to be able to change this repo, but without getting notified.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants