Skip to content

Conversation

@jan-janssen
Copy link
Member

@jan-janssen jan-janssen commented Feb 9, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Internal code improvements to enhance maintainability and reduce duplication. No changes to user-facing functionality.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 9, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch refresh_memory_dict

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@jan-janssen jan-janssen marked this pull request as draft February 9, 2026 19:00
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 9, 2026

Note

Currently processing new changes in this PR. This may take a few minutes, please wait...

 ___________________________________
< Tom & Jerry level of bug chasing. >
 -----------------------------------
  \
   \   \
        \ /\
        ( )
      .( o ).

✏️ Tip: You can disable in-progress messages and the fortune message in your review settings.

Tip

You can make CodeRabbit's review stricter and more nitpicky using the `assertive` profile, if that's what you prefer.

Change the reviews.profile setting to assertive to make CodeRabbit's nitpick more issues in your PRs.

✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch refresh_memory_dict

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 9, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A helper function _refresh_memory_dict() was introduced to consolidate repeated inline memory dictionary refresh logic that appeared across three code paths. Previously, each location used dict comprehensions calling _check_task_output; now all three invoke the new centralized helper, eliminating duplication while maintaining identical behavior.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Memory Dictionary Refresh Refactoring
src/executorlib/task_scheduler/file/shared.py
Extracted repeated inline dict comprehension logic into new _refresh_memory_dict() helper function. Helper is invoked in three previously duplicated code paths that refresh memory dictionaries by filtering completed futures. Semantic behavior unchanged; logic consolidated for maintainability.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

Poem

🐰 Three paths became one, the code whispered with glee,
No more repetition, just helpers so free,
Memory dicts refresh with elegance bright,
Refactored and tidy, everything right! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1
❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 75.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: implementing a new helper function _refresh_memory_dict() to consolidate repeated logic, which is the primary objective of this refactoring PR.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch refresh_memory_dict

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

🧹 Recent nitpick comments
src/executorlib/task_scheduler/file/shared.py (1)

265-274: Good DRY refactor consolidating the repeated dict comprehension.

The extraction is clean and the behavior is preserved. One optional suggestion: add a brief docstring for consistency with the other private helpers in this file (e.g., _check_task_output, _convert_args_and_kwargs).

📝 Optional: add docstring
 def _refresh_memory_dict(memory_dict: dict, cache_dir_dict: dict) -> dict:
+    """
+    Refresh memory_dict by checking task outputs and removing completed futures.
+
+    Args:
+        memory_dict (dict): Mapping of task keys to their associated future objects.
+        cache_dir_dict (dict): Mapping of task keys to their cache directories.
+
+    Returns:
+        dict: Updated memory_dict with only pending (not done) futures.
+    """
     return {
         key: _check_task_output(

Warning

Review ran into problems

🔥 Problems

Git: Failed to clone repository. Please run the @coderabbitai full review command to re-trigger a full review. If the issue persists, set path_filters to include or exclude specific files.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants