Open
Conversation
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #131 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 96.27% 97.12% +0.85%
==========================================
Files 8 8
Lines 725 766 +41
Branches 110 121 +11
==========================================
+ Hits 698 744 +46
+ Misses 21 17 -4
+ Partials 6 5 -1
... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Owner
samuelcolvin
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
thanks so much for the PR. I think I like it, please could you explain exactly how it works?
Author
Author
|
@samuelcolvin A gentle reminder to review this feature whenever you have a minute |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.


Every time I used insert_assert I was ecstatic with my new productivity but something was missing: it was always painful to catch and match exceptions. Only recently have I realized that same tooling and approach could be used to solve that problem as well.
Note that this is only a working prototype without tests or proper structure/naming.
If you like the idea -- I'll be happy to provide the rest :)