Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #98 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 96.44% 96.44%
=======================================
Files 5 5
Lines 676 676
Branches 57 57
=======================================
Hits 652 652
Misses 24 24 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
|
seems pretty nice to me. Seems pretty easy to merge and change later. That said, is the site being published? |
|
Hi @johnynek, sorry for the late reply! It's not being pushed; I intend to make it so. Just wanted to see if this would be nice to have first. 😄 I'll update this later. Thanks! |
|
Hi @johnynek took me longer than expected to follow up on this. Added a step to CI to make the site automatically published on release. |
| addSbtPlugin("com.typesafe.sbt" % "sbt-site" % "1.4.1") | ||
| addSbtPlugin("com.typesafe.sbt" % "sbt-ghpages" % "0.6.3") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
These allows us to easily do adhoc site pushes through docs/ghpagesPushSite
|
This is great! I personally think the win of using an all scala/sbt solution is worth it in terms of simplicity of the CI and build. |
|
🎉 We use this on http4s-jdk-http-client, and I would love to see it spread. The multi-version support is lacking, but other than that, it's a solid tool and an attractive, functional theme. And no futzing with Jekyll or Hugo is a big win. |
|
Related to #7 |
I know #39 is still being worked on but since we have already paradox I thought we could put it to some use in the meantime? wdyt is it worth it?